The poignancy of power

The comments of the attorney representing one of the convicted felons out of the Enron trial today indicates that the defense teams really believe in the innocence of the defendants.  Sure, it could be courthouse-step posturing, and as someone once said, the prisons are full of people who swear they’re innocent.  But in the past few years, the dirty white collars bring a whole new dimension to the question of guilt and innocence or right and wrong — because many of the convicted, and us, may no longer know the difference between them. 

Here’s a theory:  the path to power and finally achieving it may require a drive that obliterates the distractions of accountability.  A blindness.  Power and financial dominance — and all the things that go with them — require such a focus and on their own are so valuable and important in business and our society, every other priority pales in comparison.

This is no longer infuriating.  It’s just sad.  I feel great sadness when I read and hear the rationalizations and justifications and look forward to more accounts of understanding, contrition and perspective about what is really important in this world.  And over the long term, I want to hear what someone has learned from his fall from grace and what he will do with that knowledge.

To be civilized means to be civil — to be real and clear about how our own actions, and inaction, contribute to the blurring of boundaries that end up hurting someone, somewhere.  As much as this is a nation of laws, it still comes down to each person facing the consequences of behavior — atoning for the negative while reinforcing the positive.  It’s not just about black-letter law.  Every exec of an under-performing company who rationalizes his or her way into thinking that a $30 million salary is justified — every board and every HR consultant who spins a salary of that magnitude as something of value to shareholders — is lying not just to the world but to themselves.  This is what is so sad:  they don’t even know it.  And while the rest of us might not know it, either, I believe we can learn it all over again.  We just have to get real.

Advertisements

One thought on “The poignancy of power”

  1. That’s not a drive to power: that’s sociopathology.
    A real drive for power means listening to your colleagues and playing by the rules of the game. The Enron folks clearly violated the rules of the game and disregarded the folks who worked for the company.
    Charles Schwab, Larry Page, and Steve Jobs have all exhibited a drive for power without stealing in the process.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s